This report contains certain forward-looking statements, including information about or related to our future results, certain projections and business trends. Assumptions relating to forward-looking statements involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. When used in this report, the words "estimate," "project," "intend," "believe," "expect" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any or all of the assumptions could prove inaccurate, and we may not realize the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Management decisions are subjective in many respects and susceptible to interpretations and periodic revisions based upon actual experience and business developments, the impact of which may cause us to alter our business strategy or capital expenditure plans that may, in turn, affect our results of operations. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included in this report, you should not regard the inclusion of such information as our representation that we will achieve any strategy, objectives or other plans. The forward-looking statements contained in this report speak only as of the date of this report, and we have no obligation to update publicly or revise any of these forward-looking statements.

These and other statements, which are not historical facts, are based largely upon our current expectations and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, our planned effort to redeploy our assets and use our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities to enhance stockholder value following the sale of substantially all of our electronic commerce business, which represented substantially all of our revenue generating operations and related assets, and the risks and uncertainties set forth in the section headed "Risk Factors" of Part I, Item 1A of this report and described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of Part II of this report. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in our efforts to redeploy our assets or that any such redeployment will result in Clarus’ future profitability. Our failure to redeploy our assets could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Clarus Corporation ("Clarus" or the "Company," which may be referred to as "we," "us," or "our") was formerly a provider of e-commerce business solutions until the sale of substantially all of its operating assets in December 2002. We are currently seeking to redeploy our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities to enhance stockholder value and are seeking, analyzing and evaluating potential acquisition and merger candidates. We were incorporated in Delaware in 1991 under the name SQL Financials, Inc. In August 1998, we changed our name to Clarus Corporation. Our principal corporate office is located at One Landmark Square, Stamford, Connecticut 06901 and our telephone number is (203) 428-2000.

At the 2002 annual meeting of our stockholders held on May 21, 2002, Warren B. Kanders, Burtt R. Ehrlich and Nicholas Sokolow were elected by our stockholders to serve on our Board of Directors. Under the leadership of these directors, our Board of Directors adopted a strategy of seeking to enhance stockholder value by pursuing opportunities to redeploy our assets through an acquisition of, or merger with, an operating business that will serve as a platform company, using our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, other non-operating assets (including, to the extent available, our net operating loss carryforward) and our publicly-traded stock to enhance future growth. The strategy also sought to reduce significantly our cash expenditure rate by targeting, to the extent practicable, our overhead expenses to the amount of our investment income until the completion of an acquisition or merger. While the Company's operating expenses, excluding transaction expenses, have remained relatively stable during the past three fiscal years, management currently believes that the Company's operating expenses, excluding potential unsuccessful transaction expenses, will exceed investment income during 2008 due to declines in interest rates and earnings on investments.

As part of our strategy to enhance stockholder value, on December 6, 2002, we consummated the sale of substantially all of the assets of our electronic commerce business, which represented substantially all of our revenue generating operations and related assets, to Epicor Software Corporation ("Epicor"), a Delaware corporation, for a purchase price of $1.0 million in cash (the "Asset Sale"). Epicor is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol "EPIC." The sale included licensing, support and maintenance activities from our eProcurement, Sourcing, View (for eProcurement), eTour (for eProcurement), ClarusNET, and Settlement software products, our customer lists, certain contracts and certain intellectual property rights related to the purchased assets, maintenance payments and certain furniture and equipment. Epicor agreed to assume certain of our liabilities, such as executory obligations arising

under certain contracts, agreements and commitments related to the transferred assets. We remained responsible for all of our other liabilities, including liabilities under certain contracts, any violations of environmental laws and for our obligations related to any of our indebtedness and employee benefit plans or taxes that were due and payable in connection with the acquired assets on or before the closing date of the Asset Sale.

Upon the closing of the sale to Epicor, Warren B. Kanders assumed the position of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, Stephen P. Jeffery ceased to serve as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and James J. McDevitt ceased to serve as Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Jeffery agreed to continue to serve on the Board of Directors and serve in a consulting capacity for a period of three years. In addition, the Board of Directors appointed Nigel P. Ekern as Chief Administrative Officer to oversee the operations of Clarus and to assist with our asset redeployment strategy. Mr. Ekern resigned December 31, 2006. Philip A. Baratelli assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer on February 1, 2007.

On January 1, 2003, we sold the assets related to our Cashbook product, which were excluded from the Epicor transaction, to an employee group headquartered in Limerick, Ireland. This completed the sale of nearly all of our active software operations as part of our strategy to limit operating losses and enable us to reposition our business in order to enhance stockholder value. In anticipation of the redeployment of our assets, our cash equivalents and marketable securities are being held in short-term, highly rated instruments designed to preserve safety and liquidity and to exempt us from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

We are currently working to identify suitable merger partners or acquisition opportunities. Although we are not targeting specific industries for potential acquisitions, we plan to seek businesses with substantial operations and free cash flow, experienced management teams, and operations in markets offering substantial growth opportunities. Our investment criteria generally includes companies with a transaction value of between $200 million to over $500 million with levels of earnings before income tax, taxes, depreciation and amortization of approximately $25 million or greater so as to utilize our available net operating loss tax carryforwards (“NOLs”). In addition, we believe that our common stock, which has a strong institutional stockholder base, offers us flexibility as acquisition currency and will enhance our attractiveness to potential merger or acquisition candidates. This strategy is, however, subject to certain risks. See "Risk Factors" below.

As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2004, the Company's common stock was delisted from the NASDAQ National Market effective with the open of business on October 5, 2004. The delisting followed a determination by the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel that the Company was a "public shell" and should be delisted due to policy concerns raised under NASDAQ Marketplace Rules 4300 and 4300(a)(3). The Company's common stock is now quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service under the symbol "CLRS.PK."

At the Company's annual stockholders meeting on July 24, 2003, the stockholders approved an amendment (the "Amendment") to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to restrict certain acquisitions of Clarus' securities in order to help assure the preservation of our NOLs. Although the transfer restrictions imposed on our securities are intended to reduce the likelihood of an impermissible ownership change, no assurance can be given that such restrictions would prevent all transfers that would result in an impermissible ownership change. The Amendment generally restricts and requires prior approval of our Board of Directors of direct and indirect acquisitions of the Company's equity securities if such acquisition will affect the percentage of our capital stock that is treated as owned by a 5% stockholder. The restrictions will generally only affect persons trying to acquire a significant interest in our common stock.

On February 7, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”) which provides for a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of our common stock, payable to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 12, 2008. Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at a purchase price of $12.00. The Rights Agreement is designed to assist in limiting the number of 5% or more owners and thus reduce the risk of a possible “change of ownership” under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended. A significant penalty is imposed on any person or group that acquires 4.9% or more (but less than 50%) of our then-outstanding common stock without the prior approval of our Board of Directors. There is no guaranty that the objective of the Rights Agreement of preserving the NOLs will be achieved. There is a possibility that certain transactions may be completed by stockholders or prospective stockholders that could trigger an “ownership change.” The parties to the Rights Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2008 are Clarus and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent.

Prior to the sale of substantially all of our operating assets in December 2002, we developed, marketed and supported Internet-based business-to-business e-commerce software that automated the procurement, sourcing, and settlement of goods and services. Our software was designed to help organizations reduce the costs associated with the purchasing and payment settlement of goods and services, and help to maximize procurement economies of scale.

All of our employees are based in the United States. As of December 31, 2007, we had a total of ten employees, all of which are located in our Stamford, Connecticut headquarters. Our employees devote as much of their time as is necessary to the affairs of the Company and also serve in various capacities with other public and private entities. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Warren B. Kanders, 50, has served as one of our directors since June 2002 and as Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors since December 2002. Since May 2007, Mr. Kanders has served as a director of Highlands Acquisition Corp., a publicly-held blank check company formed with a focus on acquiring a business in the healthcare industry. Since August 2007, Mr. Kanders has served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc., a blank check company formed with a focus on acquiring a business in no particular industry or geography. Mr. Kanders has served as the President of Kanders & Company since 1990. Prior to the completion of the acquisition of Armor Holdings, Inc., formerly a New York Stock Exchange-listed company and a manufacturer and supplier of military vehicles, armed vehicles and safety and survivability products and systems to the aerospace & defense, public safety, homeland security and commercial markets, by BAE Systems plc on July 31, 2007, he served as the Chairman of the Board of Armor Holdings, Inc. since January 1996 and as its Chief Executive Officer since April 2003. From April 2004 until October 2006, Mr. Kanders served as the Executive Chairman, and since October 2006, has served as the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc., a publicly-held company that, through its subsidiary, Concord Steel, is a leading independent manufacturer of steel counterweights. Since November 2004, Mr. Kanders has served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Langer, Inc., a Nasdaq-listed provider of orthotic and skin-care products. From October 1992 to May 1996, Mr. Kanders served as Founder and Vice Chairman of the Board of Benson Eyecare Corporation, a distributor of eye care products and services.

Philip A. Baratelli, 40, has served as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer since February 2007. Since February 2007, Mr. Baratelli has also served as Chief Financial Officer for Kanders & Company, Inc., a private investment firm principally owned and controlled by Mr. Warren B. Kanders that makes investments in and provides consulting services to public and private entities. Since April 2007, Mr. Baratelli has served as the Chief Financial Officer for Highlands Acquisition Corp., a publicly-held blank check company formed with a focus on acquiring a business in the healthcare industry. Since August 2007, Mr. Baratelli has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc. a blank check company formed with a focus on acquiring a business in no particular industry or geography. From June 2001 to February 2007, Mr. Baratelli was the Corporate Controller and Treasurer of Armor Holdings, Inc., a manufacturer and supplier of military vehicles, armored vehicles and safety and survivability products and systems serving aerospace & defense, public safety, homeland security and commercial markets. From February 1998 to February 2001, Mr. Baratelli was employed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in various positions ranging from Associate to Senior Associate. From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Baratelli worked for Barnett Banks, Inc. in various finance and credit analysis positions. Mr. Baratelli received a Bachelor of Science in finance from Florida State University in 1989 and a Bachelor of Business Administration in accounting from the University of North Florida in 1995. Mr. Baratelli is a Certified Public Accountant.

Our Internet address is www.claruscorp.com. We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, and the proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed with respect to our equity securities under section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are also available on our Internet website. All of the foregoing materials are located at the ‘‘SEC Filings’’ tab. The information found on our website shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this report into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers, a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, subsidiaries and affiliates, an Audit Committee Charter, Complaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters, a Compensation Committee Charter, a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and Corporate Governance Guidelines, all of which are available at our Internet website at the tab ‘‘Investor Relations.’’ We will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of the foregoing materials. We intend to disclose future amendments to the provisions of the foregoing documents, policies and guidelines and waivers therefrom, if any, on our Internet website and/or through the filing of Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Materials we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be read and copied at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov. In addition, you may request a copy of any such materials, without charge, by submitting a written request to: Clarus Corporation, c/o the Secretary, One Landmark Square, 22nd Floor, Stamford, Connecticut 06901.

In addition to other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently consider to be immaterial, may also impact our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. If any of the following risks occur, our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

As a result of the sale of substantially all of our electronic commerce business, we will no longer generate revenue previously associated with the products and contracts comprising our electronic commerce business. We are not profitable and have incurred an accumulated deficit of $282.1 million from our inception through December 31, 2007. Our current ability to generate revenues and to achieve profitability and positive cash flow will depend on our ability to redeploy our assets and use our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities to reposition our business whether it is through a merger or acquisition. Our ability to become profitable will depend, among other things, (i) on our success in identifying and acquiring a new operating business, (ii) on our development of new products or services relating to our new operating business, and (iii) on our success in distributing and marketing our new products or services.

As part of our strategy to limit operating losses and enable Clarus to redeploy its assets and use its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities to enhance stockholder value, we have sold our electronic commerce business, which represented substantially all of our revenue generating operations and related assets. We are pursuing a strategy of identifying suitable merger partners and acquisition candidates that will serve as a platform company. Although we are not targeting specific business industries for potential acquisitions, we plan to seek businesses with operations and free cash flow, experienced management teams, and operations in markets offering significant growth opportunities. In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for a potential acquisition, we expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours including other blank check companies, private equity groups, venture capital funds, leveraged buyout funds, and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities are well-established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, many of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than us which will give them a competitive advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses. We may not be able to successfully identify such a business, obtain financing for such acquisition, or successfully operate any business that we identify. We have been working without success since December 2002 to identify a suitable merger partner and consummate an acquisition. Failure to redeploy successfully will result in our inability to become profitable.

Even if we identify an appropriate acquisition opportunity, we may be unable to negotiate favorable terms for that acquisition. We may be unable to select, manage or absorb or integrate any future acquisitions successfully. Any acquisition, even if effectively integrated, may not benefit our stockholders. Any acquisitions that we attempt or complete may involve a number of unique risks including: (i) executing successful due diligence; (ii) our exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; and (iii) our ability to integrate and absorb the acquired company successfully. We may be unable to address these problems successfully. Our failure to redeploy our assets could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to successfully effect a redeployment of our assets and successfully run the Company following such a transaction is dependent upon the efforts of key management, including Warren B. Kanders, our Executive Chairman of the Board of the Directors. The loss of his services, or the inability of the Company to continue to retain his services on mutually satisfactory terms, could have a detrimental effect on the market price of our common stock and our future business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our executive employees devote as much of their time as is necessary to the affairs of the Company and also serve in various capacities with other public and private entities, including blank check companies and not-for-profit entities affiliated with Kanders & Company. While management believes these non-exclusive arrangements benefit the Company by availing itself of certain of the resources of Kanders & Company, the other business interests of these individuals could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs. It is noted, however, that the obligations of our executive management team to present business opportunities to the other business entities they are affiliated with is first subject to any pre-existing fiduciary or other obligations our executive management team may owe to Clarus.

As part of our plan to redeploy our assets, our management is seeking, analyzing and evaluating potential acquisition and merger candidates. We have incurred and will continue to incur significant costs, such as due diligence and legal and other professional fees and expenses, as part of these redeployment efforts. We incurred approximately $1.4 million of transaction related expenses during 2006 for due diligence and negotiation of potential acquisitions. In 2004, we incurred $1.6 million of transaction related expenses during due diligence and negotiation of potential acquisitions. Notwithstanding these efforts and expenditures, we cannot give any assurance that we will identify an appropriate acquisition opportunity in the near term, or at all.

Because we may consummate a merger or acquisition with a company in any industry and are not limited to any particular type of business there is no current basis for you to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the particular industry in which we may ultimately operate or the target business which we may ultimately acquire. If we complete a merger or acquisition with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, we may be affected by the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular industry or target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. Even if we properly assess those risks, some of them may be outside of our control or ability to affect. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our securities will not ultimately prove to be less favorable to our stockholders than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a target business.

We have not identified what our new line of business will be; therefore, we cannot fully describe the specific risks presented by such business. It is likely that we will have had no operating history in the new line of business and it is possible that the target company may have a limited operating history in its business. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our future operations will generate operating or net income, and as such our success will be subject to the risks, expenses, problems and delays inherent in establishing a new line of business for Clarus. The ultimate success of such new business cannot be assured.

The role of our management team and key personnel from the target business we acquire cannot presently be ascertained. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after a redeployment of our assets, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a public company which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which may adversely affect our operations.

We must conduct a due diligence investigation of the target businesses we intend to acquire. Intensive due diligence is time consuming and expensive due to the operations, accounting, finance and legal professionals who must be involved in the due diligence process. Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will reveal all material issues that may affect a particular target business, or that factors outside the control of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. If our diligence fails to identify issues specific to a target business, industry or the environment in which the target business operates, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our common stock. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination debt financing.

As a result of the final rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005, Clarus may be deemed to be a shell company. The rules are designed to ensure that investors in shell companies that acquire operations have timely access to the same kind of information as is available to investors in public companies generally. The rules prohibit the use by shell companies of a Form S-8 and revise the Form 8-K to require a shell company to include extensive registration-level information required to register a class of securities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), in the filing on Form 8-K that the shell company files to report the acquisition of a business.

The extensive registration-level information includes a detailed description of a company’s business and properties, management, executive compensation, related party transactions, legal proceedings and historical market price information, as well as audited historical financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations. The revised Form 8-K rules also require a shell company to file pro forma financial statements giving effect to the acquisition not later than four business days after completion of the acquisition, instead of 75 days as required by non-shell companies.

The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some acquisition prospects to prepare such detailed disclosures and obtain audited financial statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by Clarus, or deter potential targets from negotiating with Clarus. If Clarus were to be deemed a shell company, any increased difficulty in Clarus’ ability to identify and consummate an acquisition with an appropriate merger candidate can materially adversely affect Clarus’ ability to successfully implement its redeployment strategy.

NOLs may be carried forward to offset federal and state taxable income in future years and eliminate income taxes otherwise payable on such taxable income, subject to certain adjustments. Based on current federal corporate income tax rates, our NOL and other carryforwards could provide a benefit to us, if fully utilized, of significant future tax savings. However, our ability to use these tax benefits in future years will depend upon the amount of our otherwise taxable income. If we do not have sufficient taxable income in future years to use the tax benefits before they expire, we will lose the benefit of these NOL carryforwards permanently. Consequently, our ability to use the tax benefits associated with our substantial NOL will depend significantly on our success in identifying suitable merger partners and/or acquisition candidates, and once identified, successfully consummate a merger with and/or acquisition of these candidates.

Additionally, if we underwent an ownership change, the NOL carryforward limitations would impose an annual limit on the amount of the taxable income that may be offset by our NOL generated prior to the ownership change. If an ownership change were to occur, we may be unable to use a significant portion of our NOL to offset taxable income. In general, an ownership change occurs when, as of any testing date, the aggregate of the increase in percentage points of the total amount of a corporation's stock owned by "5-percent stockholders" within the meaning of the NOL carryforward limitations whose percentage ownership of the stock has increased as of such date over the lowest percentage of the stock owned by each such "5-percent stockholder" at any time during the three-year period preceding such date is more than 50 percentage points. In general, persons who own 5% or more of a corporation's stock are "5-percent stockholders," and all other persons who own less than 5% of a corporation's stock are treated together as a public group.

The amount of NOL and tax credit carryforwards that we have claimed has not been audited or otherwise validated by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). The IRS could challenge our calculation of the amount of our NOL or our determinations as to when a prior change in ownership occurred and other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to carry forward our NOL to offset taxable income in future years. If the IRS was successful with respect to any such challenge, the potential tax benefit of the NOL carryforwards to us could be substantially reduced.

On July 24, 2003, at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved an amendment (the "Amendment") to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to restrict certain acquisitions of our securities in order to help assure the preservation of our NOL. The Amendment generally restricts direct and indirect acquisitions of our equity securities if such acquisition will affect the percentage of Clarus' capital stock that is treated as owned by a "5% stockholder." Additionally, on February 7, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a Rights Agreement which is designed to assist in limiting the number of 5% or more owners and thus reduce the risk of a possible “change of ownership” under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended.

Although the transfer restrictions imposed on our capital stock and the Rights Agreement are intended to reduce the likelihood of an impermissible ownership change, there is no guarantee that such protective measures would prevent all transfers that would result in an impermissible ownership change. These protective measures also will require any person attempting to acquire a significant interest in us to seek the approval of our Board of Directors. This may have an "anti-takeover" effect because our Board of Directors may be able to prevent any future takeover. Similarly, any limits on the amount of capital stock that a stockholder may own could have the effect of making it more difficult for stockholders to replace current management. Additionally, because protective measures implemented by us to preserve our NOL will have the effect of restricting a stockholder's ability to acquire our common stock, the liquidity and market value of our common stock might suffer.

If we effect an acquisition or merger with a company located outside of the United States, the laws of the country in which such company operates will govern almost all of the material agreements relating to its operations. We cannot assure you that the target business will be able to enforce any of its material agreements or that remedies will be available in this new jurisdiction. The system of laws and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdiction may not be as certain in implementation and interpretation as in the United States. The inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss of business, business opportunities or capital. Additionally, if we acquire a company located outside of the United States, it is likely that substantially all of our assets would be located outside of the United States and some of our officers and directors might reside outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon our directors or officers or to enforce judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties of our directors and officers under Federal securities laws.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls and requires that we have such system of internal controls audited. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties and/or stockholder litigation. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports could harm our business. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires that our independent registered public accounting firm report on management’s evaluation of our system of internal controls. An acquisition target may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of their internal controls. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition. Furthermore, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the implementation of adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act") requires registration, as an investment company, for companies that are engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading securities. We have sought to qualify for an exclusion from registration including the exclusion available to a company that does not own "investment securities" with a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets on an unconsolidated basis, excluding government securities and cash items. This exclusion, however, could be disadvantageous to us and/or our stockholders. If we were unable to rely on an exclusion under the Investment Company Act and were deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would be forced to comply with substantive requirements of the Investment Company Act, including: (i) limitations on our ability to borrow; (ii) limitations on our capital structure; (iii) restrictions on acquisitions of interests in associated companies; (iv) prohibitions on transactions with affiliates; (v) restrictions on specific investments; (vi) limitations on our ability to issue stock options; and (vii) compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations. Registration as an investment company would subject us to restrictions that would significantly impair our ability to pursue our fundamental business strategy of acquiring and operating an established business. In the event the Securities and Exchange Commission or a court took the position that we were an investment company, our failure to register as an investment company would not only raise the possibility of an enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission or an adverse judgment by a court, but also could threaten the validity of corporate actions and contracts entered into by us during the period we were deemed to be an unregistered investment company. Moreover, the Securities and Exchange Commission could seek an enforcement action against us to the extent we were not in compliance with the Investment Company Act during any point in time.

On October 5, 2004, our common stock was delisted from the NASDAQ National Market. The delisting followed a determination by the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel that the Company was a "public shell" and should be delisted due to policy concerns raised under NASDAQ Marketplace Rules 4300 and 4300(a)(3). Additional information concerning the delisting is set forth in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2004. The Company's common stock is now quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service under the symbol "CLRS.PK." As a result of the delisting, stockholders may find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of, our common stock, the liquidity of our stock may be reduced, making it difficult for a stockholder to buy or sell our stock at competitive market prices or at all, we may lose support from institutional investors and/or market makers that currently buy and sell our stock and the price of our common stock could decline.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board of Directors will be authorized to issue from time to time, without further stockholder approval, up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix or alter the designations, preferences, rights and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the shares of each series, including the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, including sinking fund provisions, redemption price or prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or designations of any series. Such shares of preferred stock could have preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation rights. We may issue additional preferred stock in ways which may delay, defer or prevent a change in control of Clarus without further action by our stockholders. Such shares of preferred stock may be issued with voting rights that may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common stock by increasing the number of outstanding shares having voting rights, and by the creation of class or series voting rights.

A key element of our growth strategy is to make acquisitions. As part of our acquisition strategy, we may issue additional shares of common stock as consideration for such acquisitions. These issuances could be significant. To the extent that we make acquisitions and issue our shares of common stock as consideration, your equity interest in us will be diluted. Any such issuance will also increase the number of outstanding shares of common stock that will be eligible for sale in the future. Persons receiving shares of our common stock in connection with these acquisitions may be more likely to sell off their common stock, which may influence the price of our common stock. In addition, the potential issuance of additional shares in connection with anticipated acquisitions could lessen demand for our common stock and result in a lower price than might otherwise be obtained. We may issue common stock in the future for other purposes as well, including in connection with financings, for compensation purposes, in connection with strategic transactions or for other purposes.

A complaint was filed on May 14, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on behalf of all purchasers of common stock of the Company during the period beginning December 8, 1999 and ending on October 25, 2000. Generally the complaint alleged that the Company and certain of its directors and officers made material misrepresentations and omissions in public filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in certain press releases and other public statements. The Company agreed to settle the class action in exchange for a payment of $4.5 million, which was covered by insurance. The Court approved the final settlement and dismissed the action on January 6, 2005.

Our common stock was listed on the NASDAQ National Market System on May 26, 1998, the effective date of our initial public offering, until October 5, 2004, when our common stock was delisted from the NASDAQ National Market following a determination by the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel that the Company was a "public shell" and should be delisted due to policy concerns raised under NASDAQ Marketplace Rules 4300 and 4300(a)(3). Additional information concerning the delisting is set forth in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2004. The Company's common stock is now quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service under the symbol "CLRS.PK".

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ National Market Composite and The Russell 2000 Index for the period commencing on December 31, 2002 and ending on December 31, 2007 (the “Measuring Period”). The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and each index was $100 on December 31, 2002. The yearly change in cumulative total return is measured by dividing (1) the sum of (i) the cumulative amount of dividends for the Measuring Period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and (ii) the change in share price between the beginning and end of the Measuring Period, by (2) the share price at the beginning of the Measuring Period.

We currently anticipate that we will retain all future earnings for use in our business and do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, contractual restrictions on payment of dividends, if any, legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends, and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.

Plan Category	(A) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		(B) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		(C) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (A))Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)		1,248,750	$	5.98		3,771,847
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (2) (3) (4)		1,100,000	$	7.83		—
Total		2,348,750	$	6.84		3,771,847

(4)

Includes 300,000 shares of restricted stock granted to the Company’s Executive Chairman, Warren B. Kanders, having voting, dividend, distribution and other rights, which shall vest and become nonforfeitable if Mr. Kanders is an employee and/or a director of the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate of the Company on the earlier of (i) the date the closing price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $15.00 per share for each of the trading days during a ninety consecutive day period, or (ii) April 11, 2013, subject to acceleration in certain circumstances.

Our selected financial information set forth below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of Part II of this Report. The following statement of operations and balance sheet data have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with those statements and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of Part II of this Report.

	Years ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:
License fees	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,106		$	—
Service fees		—			—			—			—			130
Total Revenues		—			—			—			1,106			130

Operating expenses:

General and administrative		3,767			3,530			3,504			3,395			4,986
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			—			—			—			18
Transaction expense		(13	)		1,431			(59	)		1,636			—
Loss on sale or disposal of assets		—			—			—			—			36
Depreciation		359			346			334			186			762
Total Operating Expenses		4,113			5,307			3,779			5,217			5,802
Operating Loss		(4,113	)		(5,307	)		(3,779	)		(4,111	)		(5,672	)

Other income (expense)		(6	)		—			(2	)		19			169
Interest income		4,239			4,016			2,490			1,203			1,238
Interest expense		—			—			—			—			(66	)

Net Income (Loss) Before Income Tax	$	120		$	(1,291	)	$	(1,291	)	$	(2,889	)	$	(4,331	)

Income tax		3			—			—			—			—

Net Income (Loss)	$	117		$	(1,291	)	$	(1,291	)	$	(2,889	)	$	(4,331	)

Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic	$	0.01		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.27	)
Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.27	)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
Basic		16,658			16,613			16,329			16,092			15,905
Diluted		17,051			16,613			16,329			16,092			15,905

These and other statements, which are not historical facts, are based largely upon our current expectations and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, our planned effort to redeploy our assets and use our substantial cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities to enhance stockholder value following the sale of substantially all of our electronic commerce business, which represented substantially all of our revenue generating operations and related assets, and the risks and uncertainties set forth in the section headed "Risk Factors" of Part I, Item 1A of this Report and described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of Part II of this Report. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in our efforts to redeploy our assets or that any such redeployment will result in Clarus’ future profitability. Our failure to redeploy our assets could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

AS PART OF OUR PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED STRATEGY TO LIMIT OPERATING LOSSES AND ENABLE THE COMPANY TO REDEPLOY ITS ASSETS AND USE ITS SUBSTANTIAL CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES TO ENHANCE STOCKHOLDER VALUE, ON DECEMBER 6, 2002, WE SOLD SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR ELECTRONIC COMMERCE BUSINESS, WHICH REPRESENTED SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR REVENUE GENERATING OPERATIONS AND RELATED ASSETS. THE INFORMATION APPEARING BELOW, WHICH RELATES TO PRIOR PERIODS, IS THEREFORE NOT INDICATIVE OF THE RESULTS THAT MAY BE EXPECTED FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT PERIODS. RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND ANY FUTURE PERIODS PRIOR TO A REDEPLOYMENT OF OUR ASSETS ARE EXPECTED PRIMARILY TO REFLECT GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND TRANSACTION EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONTINUING ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMPANY AND ITS EFFORTS TO REDEPLOY ITS ASSETS. SUCCESSFUL REDEPLOYMENT OF OUR ASSETS IS DEPENDENT UPON THE EFFORTS OF OUR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM, IN PARTICULAR WARREN B. KANDERS, OUR EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. WHILE MR. KANDERS RESIGNED EFFECTIVE JULY 31, 2007 AS CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ARMOR HOLDINGS, INC. IN CONNECTION WITH ITS SALE, HE AND OUR OTHER EMPLOYEES ALSO SERVE IN VARIOUS CAPACITIES WITH OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTITIES, INCLUDING BLANK CHECK COMPANIES AND NOT-FOR-PROFIT ENTITIES. AS PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED, OUR EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING MR. KANDERS DEVOTE AS MUCH OF THEIR TIME AS IS NECESSARY TO THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY.

The Company's discussion of financial condition and results of operations is based on the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company continually evaluates its estimates and assumptions including those related to revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived assets, impairment of investments, and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

The Company accounts for its marketable securities under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities". Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 115, the Company has classified its marketable securities as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities have been recorded at fair value and related unrealized gains and losses have been excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized.

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109"). Under the asset and liability method specified thereunder, deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax liabilities are offset by deferred tax assets relating to net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards and deductible temporary differences. Recognition of deferred tax assets is based on management’s belief that it is more likely than not that the tax benefit associated with temporary differences and operating and capital loss carryforwards will be utilized. A valuation allowance is recorded for those deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the realization will not occur.

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), requiring recognition of expense related to the fair value of stock option awards. The Company recognizes the cost of the share-based awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock option plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Under SFAS 123R, compensation cost recognized during 2007 and 2006 would include: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R.

Through 2004, the Company had recognized revenue in connection with its prior business from two primary sources, software licenses and services. Revenue from software licensing and services fees was recognized in accordance with Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition", and SOP 98-9, "Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions" and related interpretations. The Company recognized software license revenue when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed; (2) delivery had occurred; (3) the fee was fixed or determinable; and (4) collectibility was probable.

Prior to the December 6, 2002 sale of substantially all of the Company's revenue generating operations and assets, the Company's revenue consisted of license fees and services fees. License fees were generated from the licensing of the Company's suite of software products. Services fees were generated from consulting, implementation, training, content aggregation and maintenance support services. Following the sale of substantially all of the Company's operating assets, the Company's revenue consisted solely of the recognition of deferred services fees that were recognized ratably over the maintenance term of the license agreements for our prior suite of software products. The remaining deferred revenue was fully recognized by September 30, 2004 upon expiration of the maintenance term.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company determined that actual restructuring and related charges were in excess of the amounts provided for in the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and recorded additional restructuring charges of $250,000. This amount was charged to general and administrative costs during the year ended December 31, 2003. The charges for the year ended December 31, 2003 were comprised of $223,000 for employee separation costs and $27,000 for facility closure and consolidation costs.

On December 6, 2002, the Company completed the disposition of substantially all its operating assets, and the Company is now evaluating alternative ways to redeploy its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities into new businesses. The discussion below is therefore not meaningful to an understanding of future revenue, earnings, operations, business or prospects of the Company following such a redeployment of its assets.

General and administrative expenses increased $237,000 or 7%, to $3.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 was primarily attributable to increases in employment compensation and benefits, non-cash stock option expense and rent offset by decreases in investment custody fees, accounting fees, stock administrative fees and other professional fees. This trend is consistent with management's stated strategy to limit our expenditure rate to the extent practicable, to levels of our investment income until the completion of an acquisition or merger. However, management believes we will incur a net loss in 2008 based on our current level of expenses due to lower projected investment yields on our portfolio. General and administrative expenses include salaries and employee benefits, rent, insurance, legal, accounting and other professional fees, state and local non income based taxes, board of director fees as well as public company expenses such as transfer agent and listing fees and expenses.

Transaction expense decreased $1.4 million or 101% to a credit balance of $13,000 during the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $1.4 million during the same period in 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred approximately $12,000 in expenses and credits of $25,000 related to acquisition negotiations and due diligence processes that terminated without the consummation of an acquisition. The Company incurred approximately $1.4 million of transaction expense during the year ended December 31, 2006, arising out of acquisition negotiations and due diligence processes that terminated without the consummation of the acquisitions.

Interest income increased $223,000 or 6%, to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, includes $3.6 million and $2.5 million in discount accretion and premium amortization, respectively. The increase in interest income was due primarily to higher rates of return on investments as well as higher levels of cash available for investment. The weighted average interest rate for our investments for the year ended December 31, 2007 was 4.95% compared to 4.82% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The current earnings rate as of December 31, 2007 is 4.28%.

The current earnings rate as of January 31, 2008 is 3.98%. As of February 29, 2008, the current yield on the Company’s portfolio is 3.42% down 0.56% due to declining interest rates. On January 22, 2008, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate from 4.25% to 3.50%. We expect this interest rate reduction to negatively impact our reinvestment rate on cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities for the year ended December 31, 2008.

During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, general and administrative expenses remained stable at $3.5 million. This trend is consistent with management's stated strategy to limit our expenditure rate to the extent practicable, to levels of our investment income until the completion of an acquisition or merger. General and administrative expenses include salaries and employee benefits, rent, insurance, legal, accounting and other professional fees, state and local non income based taxes, board of director fees as well as public company expenses such as transfer agent and listing fees and expenses. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006, also includes a one-time charge of $250,000 representing the severance payment related to Mr. Nigel P. Ekern’s resignation, effective December 31, 2006.

The Company incurred approximately $1.4 million of transaction expense during the year ended December 31, 2006, arising out of acquisition negotiations and due diligence processes that terminated without the consummation of the acquisitions. In the first quarter of 2005, the Company incurred $92,000 in expenses related to an acquisition negotiation and due diligence process and also recognized a credit of $151,000 in expenses from the final settlement of outstanding expenses arising out of an acquisition negotiation and due diligence process that terminated in September 2004 without the consummation of the acquisition.

Interest income increased to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, includes $2.5 million and $1.5 million in discount accretion and premium amortization, respectively. The increase in interest income was due primarily to higher rates of return on investments. The weighted average interest rate for our investments for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 4.82% compared to 2.99% for the year ended December 31, 2005. The current earnings rate as of December 31, 2006 was 5.18%.

The Company's cash and cash equivalents increased to $41.9 million at December 31, 2007 from $1.7 million at December 31, 2006 due to a shift in the composition of the investment portfolio to cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are investments with a shorter duration, less than three months, under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Marketable securities decreased to $45.2 million at December 31, 2007 from $82.6 million at December 31, 2006. The overall combined increase of $2.7 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities is primarily due to an increase in net income, proceeds from the exercise of stock options partially offset by an increase in operating expenses for the period ended December 31, 2007.

Cash used in operating activities was approximately $1.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to cash used by operating activities of approximately $3.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in cash used by operations was primarily attributable to the Company’s higher net income, a decrease in accrued interest receivable, prepaids and other current assets, offset by an increase in discount amortization, deferred rent and non-cash items. The trend in cash used in operating activities is consistent with management's stated strategy, following the sale of substantially all of the Company's operating assets in December 2002, to reduce our cash expenditure rate by targeting, to the extent practicable, our overhead expenses to the amount of our investment income until the completion of an acquisition or merger. While the Company's operating expenses, excluding transaction expenses, have remained relatively stable during the past three fiscal years, management currently believes that the Company's operating expenses, excluding potential unsuccessful transaction expenses, will exceed investment income during 2008, due to the declining interest rate environment.

Cash provided by investing activities was approximately $40.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2007. The cash was provided by the maturity of marketable securities partially offset by the purchase of marketable securities. Cash used by investing activities was approximately $18.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. The cash was used for the purchase of marketable securities partially offset by the maturity of marketable securities.

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), requiring recognition of expense related to the fair value of stock option awards. The Company recognizes the cost of the share-based awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock option plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Under SFAS 123R, compensation cost recognized during 2007 and 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. The Company recorded total non-cash stock compensation expense of approximately $268,000 and $301,000, respectively related to unvested restricted stock under SFAS 123R for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred compensation expense of approximately $176,000 related to stock options. For the year ended December 31, 2006 the Company incurred no compensation expense related to options under SFAS 123R.

On December 13, 2007, the Company issued 430,000 stock options, under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, to directors and employees of the Company. The vesting period for 150,000 options issued to directors was one year and four years for the remaining 280,000 options issued to employees. For computing the fair value of the stock-based awards, the fair value of each option grant has been estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

On December 30, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors accelerated the vesting of unvested stock options previously awarded to employees, officers and directors of the Company under its Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan of Clarus Corporation (as amended and restated effective as of June 13, 2000) and the Clarus Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, subject to such optionee entering into lock-up, confidentiality and non-competition agreements. As a result of this action, options to purchase 676,669 shares of common stock that would have vested over the next one to three years became fully vested.

The decision to accelerate the vesting of these options was made primarily to reduce non-cash compensation expense that would have been recorded in future periods following the Company’s application of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123, “Share Based Payment (revised 2004) (“SFAS 123R”). The Company adopted the expense recognition provisions of SFAS 123R beginning January 1, 2006. The acceleration of the options is expected to reduce the Company’s non-cash compensation expense related to these options by approximately $1.5 million or $0.09 per share (pre-tax) for the years 2006 - 2008, based on estimated value calculations using the Black-Scholes methodology.

On December 6, 2002, the Company had granted options to purchase 1,250,000 shares of common stock to three senior executives. 450,000 of these options were issued with an exercise price of $5.35 per share which was less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on that date of $5.45; accordingly a compensation charge of $65,000 was being recognized over the vesting period of five years. Twenty percent of the options vested annually over five years on the anniversary of the date of grant. Due to the acceleration of the vesting of stock options by the Company, the remaining compensation charge of $8,500 was recognized as of December 31, 2005.

At December 31, 2007, the Company has net operating loss, research and experimentation credit and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $228.4 million, $1.3 million and $56,000, respectively, which expire in varying amounts beginning in the year 2009. The Company also has a capital loss carryforward of $1.6 million which expires in 2008. The Company's ability to benefit from certain net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code due to a prior ownership change of greater than 50%. Accordingly, approximately $223.1 million of the $228.4 million of U.S. net operating loss carryforward is currently available to offset taxable income that the Company may recognize in the future. Of the approximately $223.1 million of net operating losses available to offset taxable income, approximately $206.4 million does not begin to expire until 2020 or later, subject to compliance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code as indicated by the following schedule:

	Net Operating Loss			Capital Loss
Expiration Dates December 31	Amount (000’s)			Amount (000’s)

2007	$	—		$	0
2008		—			1,599
2009		1,900
2010		7,417
2011		7,520
2012		5,157
2020		29,533
2021		50,430
2022		115,000
2023		5,712
2024		3,566
2025		1,707
2026		476
Total		228,418			1,599
Section 382 limitation		(5,363	)		—
After Limitations	$	223,055		$	1,599

*Subject to compliance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.

In September 2003, the Company and Kanders & Company, an entity owned and controlled by the Company's Executive Chairman, Warren B. Kanders, entered into a 15-year lease with a five-year renewal option, as co-tenants to lease approximately 11,500 square feet in Stamford, Connecticut. The Company and Kanders & Company have initially agreed to allocate the total lease payments of $24,438 per month on the basis of Kanders & Company renting 2,900 square feet initially for $6,163 per month, and the Company renting 8,600 square feet initially for $18,275 per month, which are subject to increase during the term of the lease. The lease provides the co-tenants with an option to terminate the lease in years eight and ten in consideration for a termination payment. The Company and Kanders & Company agreed to pay for their proportionate share of the build-out construction costs, fixtures, equipment and furnishings related to preparation of the space. In connection with the lease, the Company obtained a stand-by letter of credit in the amount of $850,000 to secure lease obligations for the Stamford facility. The bank that issued the letter of credit holds an $850,000 deposit against the letter of credit. Kanders & Company reimburses the Company for a pro rata portion of the approximately $5,000 annual cost of the letter of credit.

We also leased approximately 5,200 square feet near Toronto, Canada, at a cost of approximately $11,000 per month, which was used for the delivery of services as well as research and development through October 2001. This lease expired on February 14, 2006. This facility had been sub-leased for approximately $5,000 a month, pursuant to a sublease, which expired on January 30, 2006. The cost, net of the estimated sublease income, was included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying statement of operations in 2002.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB No. 115,” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 allows a company to irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and financial liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” or FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. There was no change to the net amount of assets and liabilities recognized in the statement of financial condition as a result of our adoption of FIN 48. At January 1, 2007, we had no unrecognized tax benefits.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which establishes a framework for reporting fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008, with the exception that the applicability of SFAS No. 157’s fair value measurement requirements to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis has been delayed by the FASB for one year. The Company does not believe that the requirements of SFAS No. 157 which were effective for the Company on January 1, 2008 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the SFAS No. 157 requirements which will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

In December 2007, the FASB released SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (revised 2007) (“SFAS 142(R)”), which changes many well-established business combination accounting practices and significantly affects how acquisition transactions are reflected in the financial statements. Additionally, SFAS 141(R) will affect how companies negotiate and structure transactions, model financial projections of acquisitions and communicate to stakeholders. SFAS 141(R) must be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this statement could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB released SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interests and requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. Previously, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest was reported as an expense or other deduction in arriving at consolidated net income. SFAS 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company believes the adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

	2007
	First			Second			Third			Fourth
	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Quarter
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating loss	$	( 874	)	$	( 998	)	$	(1,050	)	$	(1,191	)
Net income (loss) before taxes	$	202		$	81		$	36		$	(199	)
Net income (loss)	$	202		$	81		$	36		$	(202	)

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.01		$	0.00		$	0.00		$	(0.01	)
Diluted	$	0.01		$	0.00		$	0.00		$	(0.01	)

	2006
	First			Second			Third			Fourth
	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Quarter
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating loss		(2,249	)		(1,019	)		(961	)		(1,078	)
Net income (loss)	$	(1,382	)	$	(24	)	$	99		$	16

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.00	)	$	0.01		$	0.00
Diluted	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.00	)	$	0.01		$	0.00

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Clarus Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

ASSETS
	2007			2006

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	41,886		$	1,731
Marketable securities		45,223			82,634
Interest receivable		15			402
Prepaids and other current assets		175			207
Total current assets		87,299			84,974

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET		1,381			1,699
Total assets	$	88,680		$	86,673

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	618		$	680
Total current liabilities		618			680

Deferred rent		343			277
Total liabilities		961			957

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9)

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 17,441,747 and 17,188,622 shares issued; and 17,366,747 and 17,113,622 outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively		2			2
Additional paid-in capital		369,827			367,945
Accumulated deficit		(282,121	)		(282,238	)
Less treasury stock, 75,000 shares at cost		(2	)		(2	)
Accumulated other comprehensive gain		13			9
Total stockholders' equity		87,719			85,716
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	88,680		$	86,673

	2007			2006			2005

REVENUES:
Total revenues		—			—			—

OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administrative		3,767			3,530			3,504
Transaction expense		(13	)		1,431			(59	)
Depreciation		359			346			334
Total operating expenses		4,113			5,307			3,779

OPERATING LOSS		(4,113	)		(5,307	)		(3,779	)

OTHER EXPENSE		(6	)		—			(2	)
INTEREST INCOME		4,239			4,016			2,490

NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES		120			(1,291	)		(1,291	)

INCOME TAXES		3			—			—

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	117		$	(1,291	)	$	(1,291	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic	$	0.01		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)

Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

Basic		16,658			16,613			16,329

Diluted		17,051			16,613			16,329

																	Accumulated
					Additional												Other
	Common Stock				Paid-In			Accumulated			Treasury Stock						Comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Shares			Amount			Income (loss)

BALANCES, December 31, 2004		16,735		2		368,385			(279,656	)		(75	)		(2	)		(130	)
Exercise of stock options		448		—		2,594			—			—			—			—
Issuance of restricted shares, net of amortization		4		—		(275	)		—			—			—			—
Net loss		—		—		—			(1,291	)		—			—			—
Increase in unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—		—			—			—			—			42
BALANCES, December 31, 2005		17,187		2		370,704			(280,947	)		(75	)		(2	)		(88	)

Exercise of stock options		—		—		—			—			—			—			—
Issuance of restricted shares, net of amortization		1		—		301			—			—			—			—
Net loss		—		—		—			(1,291	)		—			—			—
Reclassification of deferred compensation upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R as of January 1, 2006		—		—		(3,060	)		—			—			—			—
Increase in unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—		—			—			—			—			97
BALANCES, December 31, 2006		17,188		2		367,945			(282,238	)		(75	)		(2	)		9

Exercise of stock options		247		—		1,438			—			—			—			—
Issuance of restricted shares, net of amortization		7		—		444			—			—			—			—
Net income		—		—		—			117			—			—			—
Increase in unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—		—			—			—			—			4
BALANCES, December 31, 2007		17,442	$	2	$	369,827		$	(282,121	)		(75	)	$	(2	)	$	13

				Total
	Deferred			Stockholders'			Comprehensive
	Compensation			Equity			Loss

BALANCES, December 31, 2004		(3,745	)		84,854			—
Exercise of stock options		—			2,594			—
Issuance of restricted shares, net of amortization		685			410			—
Net loss		—			(1,291	)		(1,291	)
Increase in unrealized gain on marketable securities		—			42			42
Total comprehensive loss							$	(1,249	)

BALANCES, December 31, 2005		(3,060	)		86,609			—
Exercise of stock options		—			—			—
Issuance of restricted shares, net of amortization		—			301			—
Net loss		—			(1,291	)		(1,291	)
Reclassification of deferred compensation upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R as of January 1, 2006		3,060			—			—
Increase in unrealized gain on marketable securities		—			97			97
Total comprehensive loss							$	(1,194	)

BALANCES, December 31, 2006		—			85,716			—
Exercise of stock options		—			1,438			—
Issuance of restricted shares, net of amortization		—			444			—
Net income		—			117			117
Increase in unrealized gain on marketable securities		—			4			4
Total comprehensive loss							$	(1,073	)

BALANCES, December 31, 2007	$	—		$	87,719

	2007			2006			2005

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	117		$	(1,291	)	$	(1,291	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation of property and equipment		359			346			334
Amortization of (discount) and premium on securities, net		(2,929	)		(2,405	)		(669	)
Amortization of equity compensation plans		444			301			410
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease/(increase) in interest receivable, prepaids and other current assets		419			(154	)		77
Decrease/(increase) in deposits and other long-term assets		—			956			(1	)
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(62	)		(781	)		(731	)
Increase in deferred rent		66			69			93
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,586	)		(2,959	)		(1,778	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of marketable securities		(150,803	)		(161,004	)		(93,887	)
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of marketable securities		191,147			142,473			68,116
Purchase of property and equipment		(48	)		(49	)		(17	)
Disposal of equipment		7			—			—
Increase in transaction expenses		—			—			(135	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		40,303			(18,580	)		(25,923	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		1,438			—			2,594
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,438			—			2,594

CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		40,155			(21,539	)		(25,107	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year		1,731			23,270			48,377
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year	$	41,886		$	1,731		$	23,270

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE:
(Decrease)/increase in transaction expenses included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	—		$	(778	)	$	778
(Decrease)/increase in transaction expenses included in other assets	$	—		$	(913	)	$	913
Grant of restricted stock	$	—		$	—		$	50
Cash paid for franchise and property taxes	$	456		$	540		$	684

During 2002, the Company adopted a strategic plan to sell or abandon all active software operations and redeploy Company capital to enhance stockholder value. On December 6, 2002, the Company sold substantially all of its software operations (comprised of the eProcurement, Sourcing and Settlement product lines) to Epicor Software Corporation for $1.0 million in cash. Separately, on January 1, 2003, the Company sold the assets related to the Cashbook product, which were excluded from the Epicor transaction, to an employee group headquartered in Limerick, Ireland. Therefore, as of December 31, 2002, the Company had discontinued or abandoned substantially all software operations.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company's subsidiaries include or included Clarus CSA, Inc., Clarus International, Inc., SAI Recruitment Limited, SAI (Ireland) Limited, Clarus eMEA Ltd., i2Mobile.com Limited, SAI America Limited, REDEO Technologies, Inc., Software Architects International, Limited and SAI America LLC. As of December 31, 2007 all of these subsidiaries have ceased operations and have been dissolved or are in the process of being dissolved.

The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company regularly evaluates its estimates and assumptions including those related to revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived assets, impairment of investments, and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Marketable securities for the periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, consist of government notes and bonds. The Company accounts for its marketable securities under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities". Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 115, the Company has classified its marketable securities as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities have been recorded at fair value and related unrealized gains and losses have been excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized.

Prior to 2002, the Company made several equity investments in privately held companies. The Company's equity ownership in these entities ranged from 2.5% to 12.5%. These investments were accounted for using the cost method of accounting. The Company did not recognize any income from these companies during 2007, 2006 or 2005. The Company continues to retain ownership interest in several of the companies although they have been written down to a zero cost basis in the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

In accordance with SFAS 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and would be no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

The Company uses financial instruments in the normal course of its business. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximates fair value. Marketable securities are carried at fair value. The fair value of the Company's investments in privately held companies is not readily available. The Company believes the fair values of these investments in privately held companies approximated their respective carrying values of zero at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

The Company adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2005 Plan"), which was approved by stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting in June 2005. Under the 2005 Plan, the Board of Directors has flexibility to determine the type and amount of awards to be granted to eligible participants, who must be employees of the Company or its subsidiaries, directors, officers or consultants to the Company. The 2005 Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, and restricted units. As of December 31, 2007, the number of shares authorized and reserved for issuance under the 2005 Plan is 3.8 million, subject to an automatic annual increase equal to 4% of the total number of shares of Clarus’ common stock outstanding. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be granted through awards under the 2005 Plan to any employee in any calendar year may not exceed 500,000 shares. The 2005 Plan will continue in effect until June 2015 unless terminated sooner. As of December 31, 2007, 565,000 stock options have been awarded under the plan of which 355,000 are unvested and 210,000 are vested and eligible for exercise. The Company also had two employee stock purchase plans which were terminated in December 2007, as described more fully in Note 7.

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), requiring recognition of expense related to the fair value of stock option awards. The Company recognizes the cost of the share-based awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock option plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Under SFAS 123R, compensation cost recognized during 2007 and 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. The Company recorded total non-cash stock compensation expense of approximately $268,000 and $301,000, respectively related to unvested restricted stock under SFAS 123R for fiscal 2007 and 2006. For fiscal 2007, the Company incurred compensation expense of approximately $176,000 related to stock options. For fiscal 2006 the Company incurred no compensation expense related to options under SFAS 123R.

On December 13, 2007, the Company issued 430,000 stock options to directors and employees of the Company. The vesting period for 150,000 options issued to directors was one year and four years for the remaining 280,000 options issued to employees. For computing the fair value of the stock-based awards, the fair value of each option grant has been estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

The following table shows the effect on net loss and earnings per share if the fair value method of accounting had been applied to options issued prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of an option utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model is assumed to be amortized to expense over the option's vesting periods (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Delaware	58-1972600
(State of Incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

		PAGE

PART I
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	1
	FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	1
	OVERVIEW	1
	BUSINESS	1
	PRIOR BUSINESS	2
	EMPLOYEES	3
	AVAILABLE INFORMATION	3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	4
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	9
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	10
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	10
ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	10

PART II
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	11
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	14
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	15
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	23
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA	24
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	45
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	45
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	46

PART III
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT	46
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	46
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	46
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	46
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	46

PART IV
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	47

SIGNATURES		50
EXHIBIT INDEX		53

	High		Low
Calendar Year 2008
First Quarter (through March 3, 2008)	$	6.40	$	5.60

Year ended December 31, 2007
First Quarter	$	8.20	$	7.05
Second Quarter	$	9.80	$	8.05
Third Quarter	$	9.85	$	6.75
Fourth Quarter	$	7.30	$	5.73

Year ended December 31, 2006
First Quarter	$	8.45	$	6.90
Second Quarter	$	7.19	$	6.30
Third Quarter	$	7.34	$	6.40
Fourth Quarter	$	7.50	$	6.70

Options Vesting Period	1 year			4 years

Dividend Yield		0.00	%		0.00	%
Expected volatility		31.8	%		40.9	%
Risk-free interest rate		3.54	%		3.80	%
Expected life		5.75 years			6.25 years
Weighted average fair value	$	2.22		$	2.77

Contractual Obligations
(in thousands)	Payment Due By Period
			Less Than						More Than
	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		5 Years
Operating Leases	$	2,425	$	420	$	877	$	1,128	$	—
Total	$	2,425	$	420	$	877	$	1,128	$	—

Balance Sheet Data:	As of December 31,
	2007		2006		2005		2004		2003
Cash and cash equivalents	$	41,886	$	1,731	$	23,270	$	48,377	$	15,045
Marketable securities	$	45,223	$	82,634	$	61,601	$	35,119	$	73,685
Total assets	$	88,680	$	86,673	$	88,278	$	86,437	$	89,445
Total stockholders' equity	$	87,719	$	85,716	$	86,609	$	84,854	$	86,819

	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	25

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2007 and 2006	26

Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	27

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Loss - Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	28

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	30

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	31


	December 31,						Useful Life
	2007			2006			(in years)
Computers and equipment	$	263		$	249			1 - 5
Furniture and fixtures		488			488			7
Leasehold improvements		1,893			1,893			8
		2,644			2,630
Less: accumulated depreciation		(1,263	)		(931	)
Property and equipment, net	$	1,381		$	1,699

	2007		2006
Accounts payable	$	17	$	335
Accrued bonuses		220		30
Accrued professional services		205		201
Accrued taxes		120		98
Other		56		16
	$	618	$	680

	2005
Net loss, as reported	$	(1,291	)
Add stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss		410